Sophie Alcock, a 20-year-old chef from California, found herself in a tense situation when she was unexpectedly fired from her job at Toast, a cafe in Withington, Manchester. Furious and hurt, Sophie decided to secretly film the moment she confronted her former boss, Matt, about her termination. According to her, she was unjustly let go due to an alleged “attitude” problem and excessive phone use during work hours.

The incident took place on July 6, and it all started when Sophie informed Matt that she might be “distracted” that day because she was expecting her degree results. However, the next day, she heard rumors from a co-worker that she was getting fired because of her “attitude.” Feeling anxious and uncertain about her employment status, she decided to email Matt to get clarification. Unfortunately, he confirmed her worst fears, telling her she was no longer required to work at the cafe.

Enraged and hurt by the abrupt dismissal, Sophie confronted Matt the following day, secretly recording the conversation. In the recording, Matt accused her of being on her phone for “four hours” during work hours, which, according to him, amounted to doing very little work. Sophie contested this claim, stating that her phone records showed she was only on her phone for around two hours and 50 minutes, and some of that time was before and after her shift.

Sophie acknowledged that her shift may not have been perfect, but she believed her exam results, a momentous occasion for her, were extenuating circumstances. She felt Matt could have communicated his concerns about her work performance instead of firing her outright.

During the confrontation, Matt seemed dismissive and unwilling to engage in a meaningful conversation. He maintained that Sophie’s phone use and alleged lack of productivity were unacceptable for the business. Despite her attempts to explain her side, Matt firmly stated that she was not a fit for the cafe.

Devastated by the sudden job loss, Sophie made the decision to tell her friends and acquaintances not to visit the cafe. She hoped that her action would have an impact on the business and cause it to “suffer” as a result of her treatment.

On a positive note, Sophie had recently received her degree results, achieving a first-class degree. However, the joy of this achievement was overshadowed by the distressing experience of being fired.

Toast confirmed that Sophie is no longer employed by them but did not provide specific reasons for her termination, stating that they do not wish to breach the confidentiality of the employment relationship. They offered to discuss her concerns further and wished her well in the future.

Sophie feels embarrassed about the situation, especially since others knew about her termination before she did. Now unemployed and living in a new flat, she worries about explaining her job loss to potential employers.

As the story unfolds, both Sophie and Toast have their own perspectives on the matter. Sophie believes she was treated unfairly, while Toast insists they have strived to create a positive atmosphere for both customers and staff. They express their willingness to review improvements based on her feedback.

In the end, this incident highlights the challenges and emotions that come with sudden job termination and the importance of open communication between employers and employees to avoid misunderstandings and hurt feelings.